Photo manipulation and ethics
a. Ethics vs. Aesthetics is one of the main points of this article because it talks about the differences between the two.
b. Washington Post and New York Times both provide photographers with strict guidelines on how to shoot and edit their photographs.
c. I think some acceptable things that you could do without using unethical things are correcting red eyes, maybe changing the filter, and cropping it. To help the photo really be enhanced and defined.
d.
i think this is unethical because the filter and editing is not good. On the left side it is more grainy and undefined and on the right it is more standard and natural.
e.
This photo is the most unethical to me because it is very fake like you can tell that they imprinted that in their photo and manipulated it a lot. This photo makes it harder to detect fake photos they started doing this in the early 1900's.
b. Washington Post and New York Times both provide photographers with strict guidelines on how to shoot and edit their photographs.
c. I think some acceptable things that you could do without using unethical things are correcting red eyes, maybe changing the filter, and cropping it. To help the photo really be enhanced and defined.
d.
i think this is unethical because the filter and editing is not good. On the left side it is more grainy and undefined and on the right it is more standard and natural.
e.
This photo is the most unethical to me because it is very fake like you can tell that they imprinted that in their photo and manipulated it a lot. This photo makes it harder to detect fake photos they started doing this in the early 1900's.
Comments
Post a Comment